Policy Name: Selection Criteria for the Recruitment of Homestay Hosts
Effective: July 2008 (revised December 2017)
Approval: CEO - Australian Homestay Network
This document is for use by AHN when dealing with new host applicants. It outlines the standards that all hosts will need to meet in order to be acceptable to the AHN community. It should be used as a guide during initial contact with new applicants and referred to when conducting their home inspection.
The goal of AHN is to recruit hosts who can achieve excellent performance for students using the AHN system. Customer satisfaction can be achieved if hosts understand their duty of care and receive support and training on an ongoing basis. Hosting for the right reasons is paramount. Hosts must be financially stable and have time to spend with the student and be willing to include their students in their home/family activities.
The chronological sequence of host selection allows a supervisor to make an informed decision based on how well the prospective host deals with each stage of their application and their ability to communicate with the supervisor throughout this process. The supervisor should pay particular attention to the tone and quality of their initial communication, how well they proceed with the training and orientation and, finally, the result of their home interview.
• Positive, honest, flexible, open-minded attitude towards the homestay situation
• Willingness to communicate with the student
• Positive, tolerant attitude towards other cultures
• Interest and good motivational skills (e.g. do they sound excited at the prospect of Hosting?)
• Knowledge of specific needs of international students (e.g. prior experience and/or a willingness to train)
• Ability to facilitate students’ needs (e.g. emotional, behavioural, cultural)
• Ability to manage conflict
• Ability to introduce appropriate boundaries depending on students’ age and maturity
• Stability and strength (e.g. financial, social, emotional etc)
• Willingness of other members residing in the home to accept the student
• Ability to speak English in a clear and concise manner
The AHN community has a duty of care to all international students There are four key factors outlined below:
Duty of care exists when a stakeholder’s action, or failure to act, could reasonably be expected to affect another stakeholder. Duty of care then means being in a position where someone else is likely to be affected by what you do or do not do and where it is reasonably predictable that the other person might suffer some harm.
Standard of care is the ‘reasonable’ standard expected. A reasonable standard does not mean perfection but will vary considerably depending on who you are and the circumstances.
A breach of duty of care is the failure to meet the relevant standard of care which might happen through the failure to do something that should have been done. This does not mean that every mistake constitutes a breach of duty of care. This will depend on whether or not the mistake was reasonable in the circumstances.
Harm or loss or injury in a negligence action must be demonstrated to have been caused either directly or indirectly by the breach of duty of care. It must be able to be shown that were it not for the other person’s carelessness the damage would not have occurred. It must also be shown that the harm was reasonably foreseeable in the circumstances.
AHN representatives must be aware of discrimination legislation. Racial discrimination abounds in the Homestay industry because the majority of Homestay students wish to live with what they perceive as a ‘typical’ native Australian family. Race is not sufficient grounds to reject an applicant as a host.
While the supervisor must avoid discrimination, if a potential host, regardless of race, does not meet the selection criteria set by the supervisor then the supervisor must refuse them. For example: homestay students expect to stay with an English speaking family to improve their English language capabilities. If a high level of English is an established criterion for placing students and a household does not meet the criterion, the household can be refused as a host. If the supervisor chooses to reject potential hosts based on this criterion (or any other), the code of conduct and program policies should clearly reflect this position to protect the supervisor and the AHN community legally.
It is at AHN’s discretion whether or not the host should be informed of the reasons they are being rejected. For example, if requirements are currently lacking that may be met in the future a supervisor may wish to alert the host of what is needed; however, if a host is completely unsuitable (e.g. hosting as primary income, prior exclusion from network) the supervisor may choose to simply inform the prospective host of their unsuitability without elaboration. If the host chooses to challenge this they may be informed of the Grievance Management Policy and lodge a written request to appeal the decision. Please note that as part of the grievance proceedings applicants do have a legal right to view information collected regarding them: as such host files should be objective and not overly explicit in listing reasons for host unsuitability.
More information can be found on the following website:
Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT) as at http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/1991-81/default.asp
The objective of monitoring hosts ensures that continued performance is identified and measured against the criterion in place. Support can be offered where the need is identified to better protect both the host and the supervisor. Monitoring should take place once in each six month period.
Accommodation must be inspected prior to a student being placed according to the appropriate check list (above). A host should be advised if they have failed to supply any part of the requirements and re-checked when requirements are complete.